The term "strongly typed" has no agreed-upon definition.
It makes a "great" argument in a flamewar, because whenever someone is proven wrong, they can just redefine it to mean whatever they want it to mean. Other than that, the term serves no real purpose.
It is best to just not use the term, or, if you use it, rigorously define it first. If you see someone else use it, ask him to define the term.
"Strongly typed" and "weakly typed" are terms that have no widely agreed-upon technical meaning. Terms that do have a well-defined meaning are
Dynamically typed means that types are attached to values at run time, and an attempt to mix values of different types may cause a "run-time type error". For example, if in Scheme you attempt to add one to true by writing (+ 1 #t) this will cause an error. You encounter the error only if you attempt to execute the offending code.
Statically typed means that types are checked at compile time, and a program that does not have a static type is rejected by the compiler. For example, if in ML you attempt to add one to true by writing 1 + true, the program will be rejected with a (probably cryptic) error message. You always get the error even if the code might never be executed.
И еще момент: проект довольно большой. И мне кажется, так просто взять за неделю и перевести проект на реакт не получится. Наверное будем частями переводить.
